brandonjsfeet: LOL

brandonjsfeet: shadman is my fav artist

jimbo910: scatman is surprisingly a lot less worse when drawing loli

RockwellJones: Actually, I'm laughing at the name of the poster (Can someone by the name of Anthony Weiner [or Carlos Danger] be close behind? ^_^)

logincrash: Why the fuck is he still putting this shitty VHS filter on everything?

forest13: Someone needs to edit this, maybe just blurring out the microphones so they might look like something else.

XeonRevamp: @logincrash: its based off her channel art

Smithanon: eeyyy! Corbis asked people to send her dragon dildos a while back. someone oughta do it for the lulz.

DeWitt1912: @logincrash: I thought it was supposed to give the pic a stoned, drug-trip look.

Scrubs: I'm glad Shad's pushing back against the loli haters. I may not like some of the more violent stuff he draws, but at least he's a champion of free speech.

DeWitt1912: I wish that Shadman would draw more loli stuff. I'd like to see his take on Esther Coleman; she's right up his alley.

Anonymous¹: @Scrubs: ped0philia is not part of free speech

Froggy: @Anonymous: It is.

It's also against the law, but you are free to speak about it.

Anonymous²: @Froggy: fair enough

RockwellJones: @Anon1: True enough, but what is being defended here is not that act, but drawing an image not based on an actual event.

In short, Loli images do not involve a real person being abused in any way (unless you can find loli art drawn from an actual CP image). Thus, if no one was hurt, no crime was committed.

girlyman: Still surprised this is the only one
im not too surprised though cos if someone actually would draw one porn it would get taken down right away cos twitter